Wednesday, September 05, 2007
Tragedy strikes Royal Park again
Boggles trotting
Cost of living: Glass half empty or full?
JVP to oppose new levies
Govt. probes mounting CEB losses
Too many Sri Lankans living in poverty – Survey
Editorial
NO CONFIDENCE
DO IT FOR PROFITS
Damning COPA report on the way, said to be more damning than COPE
EPDP says no to eastern elections
Jihad story cooked up by Karuna?
Govt. confident of crushing no confidence motion
Sri Lanka has a road map to end conflict – Bogollagama assures EU
Take action on COPE report on Public Property Act – Nihal Sri Ameresekere
Poser to Ranil on his silence on Tax Amnesty Bill Vs hara kiri on $ 500 m Bond
Colombo businesses link up with regional counterparts
Lanka to make debut at Global SMEs 2007 in Malaysia
Seminar on “How to Conduct Business in Today’s Environment”
CEA chief urges biz community to focus on sustainable development
More volunteer experts from Germany
USAID, JE Austin do their part for Sri Lanka
CTC Farmers to plant Maize with Tobacco
Commodity prices will spike higher over next two years
Three Hayleys firms win Presidential Export Awards
Top tea convention begins tomorrow
China way ahead of India in agriculture sector
Kenilworth estate equals an all time record price
Eight junior shuttlers for inaugural Asian c’ships
Wanniarachchi axed for international dual contest
Tec Committee confirms Dilruwan as replacement
Lanka in biggest ever push to woo MICE tourism
Lanka Israel partner to boost tourism
Airbus super jumbo jets through Hong Kong
Brandix opens new-concept Centre of Inspiration for Casualwear
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘Bonus Shares’ canard nailed!


By Nihal Sri Ameresekere, F.C.A., F.C.M.A.

A baseless and unfounded ‘controversy’ was created on the matter of issue of ‘bonus shares’, leading it to be quite an ‘issue’ in the media, who cannot be faulted for reporting, what some persons had ‘propounded’, that no ‘bonus shares’ could be issued !


There is a concept and scheme laid down in the Companies Act No. 7 of 2007 for the management of funds of a company, and it would be clear to anyone, who understands such concept and scheme, that ‘bonus shares’ could be issued. In fact, the Companies Act No. 7 of 2007 permitted the issue of ‘bonus shares’ by introducing the concept of ‘distributions’, which would be out of ‘reserves’.


Such feature was not provided for in the repealed Companies Act No. 17 of 1982, which provided for the issue of ‘bonus shares’, only from the ‘share premium account’ and the ‘capital redemption reserve fund’. Therefore no other reserve, could have been utilised, to issue ‘bonus shares’, whereas in contravention of the repealed Companies Act No. 17 of 1982, ‘bonus shares’ were issued, even utilising other ‘reserves’, including ‘revaluation reserves’, which prevailed, curiously without any query or challenge !


Further confusions in regard to ‘distributions’ and the ‘issue’ of ‘bonus shares’ vis-à-vis the definition of ‘distribution’ in Section 529 was also baseless and unfounded, in that, it related to the ‘transfer’ of shares of a company, and not to the ‘issue’ of shares. In fact, Section 70 stipulates certain restrictions placed prohibiting a company from giving financial assistance to purchase shares of a company. However, in terms of Section 71, such restrictions in Section 70 do not apply in respect of ‘distributions’ and the ‘issue of shares’ by a company.


Section 72 (3) (b) in Section 72 vis-à-vis the prohibition for a subsidiary to acquire shares in a holding company, except to continue to hold shares acquired prior to becoming a subsidiary, but with no right to vote on such shares in the holding company states thus:


“72 (3) (b). Where a body corporate is permitted to continue as a member of the holding company by virtue of paragraph (b) of sub-section (1) and paragraph (a) of this subsection, an allotment of fully paid shares in the company may be validly made by way of capitalization of reserves of the company, which shares also will have no right to vote” – (emphasis added)


No doubt, this would make the issue quite clear to those, who had found it difficult to comprehend the concept and scheme for the issue of ‘bonus shares’, but needed to see it in ‘black and white’ !