|
BIS,
World Bank to support SAARC Payments Initiative
Sri
Lanka Central Bank to spearhead key regional move for better cross
border payments and settlement systems
Following
is the speech of Central Bank Deputy Governor Dr. Ranee Jayamah
at the launch of the SAARC Payments Initiative recently in Colombo.
It
is indeed a historic event and a landmark in the development of
payment systems in the SAARC region, because this is the first time
the member central banks, as a group, have decided to pay focused
attention to this area of activity. It is also an important achievement
for the Central Bank of Sri Lanka to be able to pioneer the efforts
in establishing the SAARC Payments Initiative.
The
SAARC Payments Initiative, which is launched today, intends to
=assist
individual SAARC countries to prepare a domestic payment strategy
and a forward looking development plan;
=design
a coordinated regional approach to cross-border payments, taking
into consideration the implications for trade, investment, central
bank policy, foreign exchange positions and their management; and
=clear
any impediments experienced by the members in the areas of policy,
operations and communications, legal and regulatory aspects, technical
and institutional infrastructure, and engage in research and statistical
analysis.
During
the course of the SAARC Payments Initiative, member countries will
be able to learn from the efforts and experiences of developments
of payments within the region, as well as outside. Some of our member
countries may have to acquire modern communication infrastructure
and advanced payment systems to support the delivery of the payment
and settlement services required, not only by their own markets,
but also by the regional market. In effect, the SAARC Payments Initiative
will be able to: (a) guide the efforts of member countries in modernising
their national payment systems; (b) assist in establishing appropriate
technological links with others in the region; and (c) bring their
payment systems to appropriate standards compatible with international
standards.
The Importance of Payment Systems
The broader term payment systems includes not only payments,
but also clearing and settlement systems. Payment systems represent
a basic infrastructure for the functioning of market economies and
in developing more inclusive financial systems, including enhancement
of access to finance. The soundness and efficiency of payment systems
are fundamental to the stability of the currency, as well as the
financial system and, therefore, to sustaining economic development.
It
is in this context that some of the governing laws of the regions
central banks include references to the responsibility of central
banks to promote the monetary, financial and payment systems in
their respective countries. If I may quote from John Exters
Report of 1949 on the establishment of the Central Bank of Ceylon,
(the former name of the present Central Bank of Sri Lanka), it states
It is the monetary, financial and payment systems that facilitate
the flow of money in the economy and as such, the Central Bank of
Ceylon undertakes a great responsibility in promoting the economic
well-being of the country.
Although
modern central banks concentrate primarily on price stability and
financial system stability, these objectives cannot be satisfactorily
achieved without simultaneous development in the payment systems.
Therefore, at some stage, all central banks have to pay attention
to payment system development, although it was taken for granted
by many until recent times.
Advances and Transformation in Payment Systems Development
Payment systems have undergone profound changes in recent years,
primarily in terms of the increased complexity of the production
and differentiation of payment services offered to customers nationally,
regionally and internationally. Payment systems are evolving towards
an evermore universal and sophisticated level of operation. In both
wholesale and retail areas, new technologies, new participants and
new alliances are beginning to transform the payments system landscape.
This transformation is largely due to developments in information
and communication technology, and integration and globalization
of financial markets at the regional and international level.
One
by-product of this transformation is the blurring of the distinction
between wholesale and retail activities. Another is the growing
integration of domestic and international payment flows, and efforts
made to develop efficient cross-border clearing mechanisms. The
emergence of non-banks in the payments system, playing a prominent
role in introducing significant new developments, is a further by-product
of this transformation. Banks still remain at the forefront of change,
but the speed at which non-banks advance in these new areas of activity,
is a significant threat to banks. This trend is now emerging in
Sri Lanka too where non-bank card issuing agencies have begun to
compete with the banks in providing payment services. These changes
have prompted central banks, in pursuit of their mission to ensure
the smooth functioning of payment systems, to establish structured
oversight functions to foster the stable, orderly and efficient
development of this area in the financial system.
The Publics Preferences and Public Policy
In assessing what might drive change and influence outcomes for
payment systems, we must start by understanding the public goals.
Regardless of the mechanism involved, people expect the payments
system to possess at least three fundamental characteristics. First,
it must have integrity, i.e. transactions must be safe, reliable,
and secure. Second, it must be accessible and available to all.
Finally, it must be competitive and efficient, i.e. the cost of
making payments should be affordable. To make an effective contribution
to the development of payments and settlements and also to increase
trade and investment flows nationally and regionally, it is necessary
to identify the common themes in the form of public policy goals.
In this context, the central banks are called upon to take certain
minimum actions to further these goals.
However,
the manner and intensity of the current involvement of central banks
in payment systems development differ from one country to another.
The roots of each central banks specific pattern of involvement
lie in the different institutional structures and traditions of
each country.
The
central banks may accordingly decide on appropriate action, beyond
the minimum, which depends on the national and institutional background.
Importance of Regional Efforts
By and large, central banks in the SAARC region and elsewhere are
currently involved with payment systems in three main ways, namely,
in an operational capacity, as payments system overseers, or as
catalysts or facilitators of market and regulatory evolution.
As
all central banks are aware, markets may encounter persistent impediments
to payment systems development and may become unable to produce
efficient and safe services. The existence of such impediments would
give rise to policy issues for central banks, especially due to
their responsibility in achieving the core objectives, such as price
stability and financial system stability. These impediments can
take the form of legal and regulatory inefficiencies, structural
and performance weaknesses of the markets, the outmoded standards
and infrastructure used, or the lack of attention by the central
banks and regulatory authorities. While it is important for the
national central banks to address these issues and find remedial
action early, given the increase in trade, investment and cross-border
financial flows, it is essential for the region to have a common
understanding and apply, where possible, common standards.
The
design of every payment system requires a series of trade-offs between
the different elements of its objectives. The precise outcome of
these trade-offs will vary, because they will be closely based both
on national realities and international best practice. This emphasizes
the need for close and continuous consultation in each country between
the suppliers of payment services and the central banks as the overseer
and regulator of the systems. The ultimate target of these consultations
is to ensure the easy availability in each country of a payment
system that meets the needs of its users, that enables the suppliers
to cover their costs, and that does not absorb an excessive proportion
of the national resources. That is why many regional payment system
development initiatives have sprung up over the last few decades.
For example, South African Development Community (SADC Payments
Initiative - 1996), the Western Hemisphere Payments Initiative (1999);
the Commonwealth Independent States Payments Initiative (2004);
and the Arab Payments Initiative (2005) are some of the well functioning
regional payment Initiatives. The common objective of all these
efforts is to identify possible measures for improving the safety,
efficiency and integrity of the regional payment systems.
The
most demanding factor, common to all, is the rapidly changing global
payment system infrastructure that is challenging the existence
of domestic and regional payment systems, which are lagging behind.
Given the increasing sophistication of cross-border transactions,
the need to mitigate risks involved in using outmoded infrastructure
has to be given priority. The SAARC payment system development strategy
should therefore be designed to cater not only to the regions
present needs, but also its future demands.
How does the SAARC Payments Initiative Work?
Let
me briefly set out the proposed institutional structure of the SAARC
Payments Initiative.
By
consensus, Hon. Governors of the SAARC central banks requested the
Central Bank of Sri Lanka to take the lead in this effort. We are
happy to be the catalyst and promoter, but hope that at an appropriate
time, this Initiative will be driven by the other SAARC member central
banks. In consultation with the SAARC Governors, we have already
appointed a SAARC Payments Council (SPC), which is composed of the
chairpersons of the National Payments Councils (NPCs) in each of
the SAARC member countries or by senior officials appointed by the
Governors of central banks in countries which do not have NPCs.
The NPCs or payments committees will coordinate and liaise with
all stakeholders in the payments area, in particular, banks and
financial institutions, stock exchanges, securities traders, stock
brokers, service providers, regulators and legal professionals.
The
SPC will be reporting to the SAARCFINANCE Governors at their annual
general meetings and will obtain general approval for implementation
of the road map which will be discussed. The SPC will be assisted
by a Secretariat for operational matters. For the time being, Mrs
Siriwardena, Director/ Payments & Settlements of the Central
Bank of Sri Lanka, has kindly agreed to be the Secretary to the
SPC. The Secretariat will take the lead to prepare a road map by
establishing working/study groups in the key areas, in particular,
policy and communication, infrastructure, research and statistical
analysis and legal and regulatory framework.
The
advisory role played by the international standard setters and other
agencies on regional payment initiatives has been important. In
this regard, the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (CPSS)
in the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), which is the standard
setter for payment system development on a global basis, has intimated
its willingness to provide technical assistance and guidance to
the SAARC Payments Initiative. Similarly, we are informed that the
World Bank is also willing to provide technical assistance and advice
to enable the SAARC Payments Initiative to start off on a sound
footing. The presence of some distinguished officials from the World
Bank at this inauguration is an encouragement.
The
SAARC member central banks should be happy to have been able to
get the SAARC Payments Initiative off the ground within such a short
period of time. Given the enthusiasm and commitment by all of us,
I hope that we, as a regional group, will make a substantial contribution
to trade, investment and economic activity of each of our countries
and also the region, as a whole.
|