Wednesday, November 26, 2008

HOME
NEWS
LIVING
MONEY
SPORTS

ABOUT US
ADVERTISING
SUBSCRIPTION
ARCHIVES
FEEDBACK
CONTACTS

GROUP SITES

ABOUT US
ADVERTISING
SUBSCRIPTION
ARCHIVES
CONTACTS
FEEDBACK

Ernst & Young recommends constructive evolution of regulatory guidance for insurance industry amid the financial crisis


Zurich, - The insurance industry and regulators should use the current global financial crisis to drive a constructive evolution of regulatory guidance, says Ernst & Young’s Global Insurance Center.

The insurance industry faces fewer urgent liquidity challenges compared with banks. However, the valuation of assets has been severely affected by the crisis and capital reserves in many insurance companies have been severely depleted.

“This is a clear sign that the interconnected web of the global financial markets has far greater implications than the industry could have predicted,” says Philipp Keller, leader of Ernst & Young’s Solvency II Taskforce. “The significant impact of the financial crisis highlights the need for enhanced risk management. It is our view that a principles-based, economic and risk sensitive approach such as Solvency II, grounded in solid governance and supervisory principles, is the right response at this time. This will produce timely, consistent and transparent messages to the public.”

Principles-based regulation places responsibility for risk management with the management and board of the regulated companies. It drives risk management standards appropriate to the complexity of the business. This will foster understanding and accountability for the risks taken but will also produce a major challenge for management teams and boards.

In addition, the Solvency II Pillar II standards on risk management, and the market discipline encouraged by Pillar III, add a qualitative dimension to complement the quantitative capital requirements. This will help avoid over-reliance on models, which was a key feature of the crisis for the banking industry.

Keller comments, “We have to recognise that a regulatory framework like Solvency II in its currently anticipated form, while a significant improvement on current prudential supervision, will never be able to provide all the answers and can only be one element of sound risk and capital management.”

Ernst & Young urges the industry and regulators to make use of events such as the current financial crisis to drive a constructive evolution of the regulatory guidance. This evolution should:

* complement the Solvency II regime with short-term liquidity testing and cashflow analysis to allow a more holistic approach to anticipating the impact of adverse events

* place more emphasis on the articulation and testing of company-specific threat scenarios, in addition to the standard quantitative requirements

The current development and the anticipated implementation of the Solvency II framework should be continued in close cooperation between regulators and the industry.

Ernst & Young maintains a Solvency II website that provides up-to-date information on proposed regulations and commentary on the potential impact of the Solvency II framework.

 
BACK TO MONEY MAIN PAGE

 

 


Editor | Webmaster | Feedback
Copyright © Rivira Media Corporation Ltd


 


Rivira Media Corporation Ltd.,
No, 742,
Maradana Road,
Colombo 10, Sri Lanka
Tele: +94 11 4869969,(Editorial) +94 11 4708888 (General line),
Fax: +94 11 470814