|
THE
BOTTOM LINE EDITORIAL
|
Credible peace, a mirage or reality?
Until the liberation of Kilinochchi on January 2, 2009
the military had an enviable record of collateral damage
during their two and half year campaign. Though there were
occasional claims by pro-LTTE media of civilians dying in
aerial bombings there were but few verifiable cases of
civilian casualties during his period. The military and
policy makers should be commended for their performance in
minimizing civilian casualties up until the capture of
Kilinochchi. However since January the situation has changed
dramatically. Most of the good work done by the military by
safeguarding the physical safety of civilians in LTTE
controlled areas has been undone with the number of reported
casualties dramatically increasing.
Last Friday, Navanethem Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for
human rights, issuing a scathing statement said that she
believed 2,800 people had died since January and that a
further 150,000 to 180,000 were trapped in the war zone. Her
figures were hotly disputed by the government which received
the High Commissioner’s statement with “dismay”. Whether
there are discrepancies in the numbers or not we are now
dealing with not tens or hundreds of casualties but in the
range of thousands for a period of less than two months. The
argument that the LTTE is mostly responsible for these
deaths and injuries, either directly by involving the
trapped civilians in combat or indirectly by holding these
civilians in an ever shrinking piece of land against their
will, may not hold for much longer. Contrary to many
extremists, politic expedients and conspiracy theorists the
international community has no love for the LTTE. The UN,
many governments and even human rights organisations have
severely criticised the LTTE for holding civilians as human
shields. Yet they have also pointed out that as a
responsible democratic institution, the onus of protecting
ones own citizens falls mainly on the government. Simply
blaming the LTTE will not exonerate the government of this
fundamental responsibility. There are many things the
government could do, short of a ceasefire which would
demonstrate that it is genuinely serious about safeguarding
the interests of the civilians.
To begin with the government could take measures to improve
the conditions of those who have managed to escape. Reports
from Vavuniya indicate that civilians who managed to escape
since January are still living in temporary shelters. Almost
all of these camps are situated in the heart of the Vavuniya
town. Though they live in a town they are confined to a mere
school premises for they are not allowed to move out of
camps. Nor are relatives allowed to visit them inside the
camps. Armed soldiers guard these camps with barbed-wire
fences around them. Then there are the more permanent
structures which are built some distance from the Vavuniya
town. Though conditions there are said to be better, only a
few thousand people have been moved into those locations.
These permanent structures have also drawn criticism from
many quarters as a measure by the government to hold the
civilian population for a considerable duration of time. Due
to these many shortcomings in handling this emergency
situation the government is fast losing the propaganda war.
If civilians are going to be held for a long duration of
time inside fenced areas without any freedom of movement and
access to outsiders, the enormous opportunity of winning the
hearts and minds of these people who were harassed by the
LTTE for many years would be lost.
It is true that there are security considerations and the
fear of LTTE infiltration in the guise of civilians. Yet it
needs to be borne in mind that a militarily defeated LTTE
can only carry on its struggle with the support of the
community. The government is presented with a fabulous
opportunity to demonstrate its commitment to treat this
segment of our population with the dignity they deserve.
Such measures will not only silence the many critics who
have pointed out the numerous flaws in the current set up
but also win over the hearts and minds of the Tamil people.
The fire of contempt that burns a person’s heart cannot be
doused by cannons and tanks alone. It needs human gestures
of kindness too. If we miss this opportunity to win the
hearts and minds of our fellow citizens who have gone
through enormous difficulties throughout the last three
decades, it would no doubt ensure that peace would only be a
mirage that keeps disappearing each time we seek it.
|